Difference between revisions of "Content strategy"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
800 bytes added ,  10:11, 5 February 2022
no edit summary
(Stub)
Line 10: Line 10:


While these efforts were led on openZIM, the Kiwix project continued his own journey. Even if this is a never ending story to maintain Kiwix software stack, this is a mature portfolio and there is no disruptive plan. But one interesting learning has been made is that people are not interested in Kiwix itself, but in the content which are made available offline. This is pretty clear if we consider the success of or Android custom apps.
While these efforts were led on openZIM, the Kiwix project continued his own journey. Even if this is a never ending story to maintain Kiwix software stack, this is a mature portfolio and there is no disruptive plan. But one interesting learning has been made is that people are not interested in Kiwix itself, but in the content which are made available offline. This is pretty clear if we consider the success of or Android custom apps.
in 2021, we have finally isolated the kiwix-hotspot activities in a dedicated "OffSpot silo" which helps to better appreciate what Kiwix as organisation. The OffSpot activities are strategic, but are not that much concerned by what will follow.
== Content push ==
Because of the history and the current context, we believe that we could better deliver if we would be more focus on the content. We are convinced that we should move our focus from a software centric approach to a a more content centric approach. Without leaving (at all) the field of the software development, we should move more torward the publishing field.
Because ultimatively, users are more interested in content than in software (which are only a mean); we believe this is a way to better come to funding too.
== Goals ==

Navigation menu